If Dems See Big Wins, Will We See A Busy Lame Duck?
July 24, 2018
In times of political change, lame duck session in the Legislature would be seen as one last chance to complete an agenda,
The last time there was significant turnover in Michigan was 2010, when Rick Snyder took over the governor’s seat from Jennifer Granholm and Republicans wrestled control of the House away from the Dems, a pretty mild lame duck session followed. That year, 105 bills were introduced in
Compare that to last election year, when the Republicans had and would retain the trifecta, holding the governor’s office and both chambers. In 2016, 214 bills and resolutions were introduced in
In 2014, 337 bills and resolutions were introduced in
Oddly, the busiest lame duck in the last 18 years was in 2008, when lawmakers introduced 297 bills after the election and adopted 44 of them. Overall productivity in lame duck was 286 bills.
When Granholm took over from John Engler in 2002, there were 147 bills introduced after the election, and 15 of them were passed. Engler signed 152 bills from lame duck session.
Former Lt. Gov. John Cherry told MIRS Tuesday that the lack of last-minute rush
“They had ample opportunity to do what they wanted to do. It is not like they were cut short. There really wasn’t as much angst as you might assume that there would be,” Cherry said.
Cherry agreed most people would assume lame duck, during turnover, would be one last chance to complete
“It is not so much a function of legislators as it is outside groups who may see a change in control as bringing a stop to the implementation of their agenda. They would be pushing for legislative action in
An example, he said, was in 2002 when Granholm took over from Engler. There was a big push to raise the limits on charter schools. Charter advocates knew Granholm wouldn’t sign such a bill, so they pressed hard for lawmakers to put the bill on Engler’s desk before he left office. Ultimately, they were unsuccessful.
Randy Richardville, who was Senate Majority Leader from 2011-2014, said it is not the number of bills that make lame duck count.
“More important than the number of bills is the quality of the bills and the impact they may have on the state,” he said. “Auto no-fault could be a significant thing to get done during this last shot, to get it done in a way that would be meaningful to people.”
Another important issue that might be addressed is returning the income tax to 3.9 percent, which Richardville said was a promise made during the Granholm years, that once the economy was back in good shape, the income tax would be returned to that level.
Richardville said this year’s lame duck will be “unprecedented” because of the amount of turnover that will occur in both House and Senate. Seventy percent of Senate seats will be occupied by newcomers next year. The House will see 40 percent turnover, due both to term limits and legislators giving up time in the House to seek all those open Senate seats.
But Richardville, a Republican, doesn’t think it’s going to result in a “blue wave.”
“I don’t think it is a wave. I think it’s a ripple. But I think at the same time, the biggest wave I’ve seen was when the Republicans took back the governor’s office and the House all about the same time and it didn’t have anything to do with what was happening at the state,” he said.
He contends Democrats at the national level pushed too far to the left with Obamacare and sent independents “scurrying to the right.”
By contrast, “the Michigan legislature and governor have not scared people by going too far to the right too fast . . . I don’t see people running away from the Michigan right, or running away from the Michigan leadership. I see more people saying, ‘You know, they did a pretty good job.’”
Cherry, a Democrat, has a different take.
“My impression is that Democrats have done a pretty good job of recruiting candidates, so they’ve got good candidates in contested races and I think it’s pretty clear there is more energy among Democrats than among Republicans. Republicans tend to be on the defensive right now,” Cherry said. “Are you going to see a big change where the Democrats are going to have a 10-seat majority? No, that’s not going to happen, but the chamber could change. It could switch, the House. And people tend to think it is the Democrats’ to lose in the gubernatorial election right now. So I do think right now the momentum is on the Democratic side and that will continue through November. A lot could happen. That’s the nature of politics. Particularly with President (Donald) Trump, every day seems to be an adventure. He was riding high on Monday, and here we are on Tuesday and he’s
Rick Johnson, a Republican who was Speaker of the House from 2001 to 2004, also doesn’t see a blue wave coming.
“I believe elections are typically won in May when candidates file for the different seats. If you have good candidates, House seats can be won against a candidate that might not be so good.”
Despite its reputation as a time for legislative mischief,
“I loved lame duck. It was a time to get things done that had not been done in the prior year and a half,” he said. “It’s unfortunate that lame duck gets frowned on like it does and that’s really not the case, especially of late with term limits.”
Cherry contended lame duck can be both good and bad.
“The truth lies in between all of that. It is an opportunity because the election politics are out of the way. That means certain things that weren’t possible before lame duck all of the sudden are possible. The reason the politics aren’t as constrained is
Regardless of whether Dems win a chamber or the governor’s office, none of these former lawmakers anticipate a big push from the governor himself to wrap up his agenda. He’s had eight years of Republican control in both House and Senate, so he has accomplished most of what he wanted to do, they contended.
“If he thought it was something that needed to get done, he went at it and got it done,” Johnson said. “He really was never one to wait. He doesn’t and never has worried about the politics of
214 bills and resolutions introduced in
6 of those passed and signed
249 total bills passed and signed after the election
337 bills and resolutions introduced in
10 of those passed and signed
217 total bills passed and signed after the election
174 bills and resolutions introduced in
9 of those passed and signed
282 total bills passed and signed after the election
105 bills introduced in
5 of those passed and signed
175 total bills passed and signed after the election
267 bills introduced in
44 of those passed and signed
286 total bills passed and signed after the election
160 bills introduced in
15 of those passed and signed
240 total bills passed and signed after the election
109 bills introduced in
12 of those passed and signed
195 total bills passed and signed after the election
147 bills introduced in
15 of those passed and signed
152 total bills passed and signed after the election